Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Wright or Wrong

I am an ordained Baptist minister and have led a congregation in the past; today I am the pastor and spiritual leader of “New Harvest Ministries.” Having been in this position for a number of years I understand the temptation of the pastor to put personal feelings into the message that is delivered on Sunday morning. It is a precarious position, particularly, in the African American community where injustice and prejudice is a constant companion.

I have listened to the sermons of Pastor Wright and I understand how the media and white America can take them totally as an assault on the sanctity of the constitution. But even more as rhetoric that may be construed as un-American. The First Amendment of our Constitution states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

As a pastor and a black man I can understand what Rev. Wright was attempting to impart into the political discourse. He could have been a lot more diplomatic and lot less inflammatory. He could have used more biblical references, yes. Jesus was a revolutionary he fought against the status quo. He was seen as one who was disruptive to the church and to society at large. Rev. Wright’s comments have caused a controversy in the media; but let’s be real, how have these comments impacted the message of unity and the politics of inclusion of Senator Obama? I am the spiritual leader of a small congregation and I understand that sometimes my words can have a significant effect on the lives of some members. But they have a God given right for free will and they exercise it on a daily basis, in congregations all over America.

The fact is that for the last two hundred years there was no question as to who would be President of the United States; A white MAN. Today we find ourselves in a historic position where the nominee will be either a black man or a woman. But we are being distracted by statements from surrogates of the candidates, other than the statements of the candidates themselves. I believe Rev. Wright was exercising his right as citizen of our nation expounding his Freedom of Speech. He can make statements that we disagree with; and I am sure that many in his church disagree with, however, loyalty in the black church goes beyond a few off centered comments by the pastor; believe me I have lived out this scenario.

We need to return the focuses to what the candidates are stating are their plans for the future of our nation.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Arrogance Personified

This political season had been historic from the democratic perspective. We will have history made know matter who wins. But I find recent development disturbing. I find the recent declarations from the Clinton campaign the epitome in arrogance.

Senator Clinton has from the beginning of this campaign projected of an air of inevitability, as if she was ordained by God to be the democratic nominee. She is behind in the number of states and in the popular vote to senator Obama. But she has the unmitigated gall to suggest that senator Obama would be an excellent vice president..

This is an insult not only to senator Obama, but the democratic process. The arrogance of Senator Clinton with the suggestion that senator Oama would make a good vice president, when she is mathematically unable to catch senator Obama according to the majority of experts. Is an insult to the millions of individuals who have voted for senator Obama. She validates this tactic by referring to her wins in so-called big states as if some states in this process mean more than anothers because of the number of delegates forgive my naivety, but I recall from civic class, the one with the most votes is the winner. .